Landslide loophole
A landslip caused damage to land, but not damage to property, and was not covered by insurance.
A landslip caused damage to land, but not damage to property, and was not covered by insurance.
Rosa had had the same childhood condition as one of her parents – shouldn’t the insurance broker have recognised that Rosa’s children might need cover for it too?
Ha Joon was unhappy that the insurance broker did not tell his son, Min, that he was not insured when Min called to lodge an insurance claim.
Kaia claimed under her accident policies after she was in a car crash. Did the insurer pay Kaia the full amount she was entitled to under her policies?
The insurer declined Sophia’s claim for prebooked accommodation costs under her ticket and baggage protection policy.
The insurer applied a policy exclusion to decline Izzy’s insurance claim for damage to an excavator. Izzy said she never would have used the excavator if she had thought it might fail.
Huang was unhappy that his insurance broker did not tell him that his premiums were going to increase until after his policies had renewed.
Customer claimed her broker led her to believe that her public liability insurance covered fines charged by her professional body as well as costs of the hearing.
Leo was unhappy with his insurance policy but did not communicate with his insurance broker.
A difficult to detect water leak caused damage – was the leak a sudden event or gradual damage?